always new words

There are two words I have come across quite a bit lately, and you won't find them in an older print dictionary.  They are words that express new cultural patterns and sensibilities.  Language is always a work in progress and adapts to new ways of thinking. Shakespeare may be difficult to understand, while the more recent language of Charles Dickens may simply sound old fashioned.  But both are proof that we think and speak differently now than then.  Think of how the meaning of the word gayhas changed over time.  In addition to such shifts in meaning, we also invent brand new words for ideas and products that didn't exist previously.

Othering, used as a verb, is such a new word.  It refers to putting up a mental and verbal barrier, or depersonalizing an entire group of people or even animals, when we distinguish them as "them, not us," or as other. It is a term that has become so relevant in an age of bipartisanship, binarism, divisiveness, and the reduction of issues to either wrong or right.   While the word otheris of course not new, using it as a verb, as in othering, is new.

Woke is the second word.  Woke is a word of African-American origin that means being aware and awakened to social and cultural issues of change.  The word's meaning hasn't changed much, but it has entered mainstream language and awareness.  

It is interesting to experience language changing right in front of my eyes.  Woke and otheringwere not in my vocabulary and awareness a few years ago, yet the need to express what these words convey has birthed them and spread their use.  Do you know any new words?  

 

the elephant in the room

Recently, I was not only asked to do some writing for producer Dena Barnett's upcoming documentary, Spiritual Healing: A New Frontier, but also to contribute a statement regarding the elephant in the room.

Which elephant, you may ask.  Well, if Spiritual Healing promises such good results why does it have such difficulty finding acceptance, credibility and traction?  The answer is two-fold and lies in the elephant so to speak.  

First, Spiritual Healing is low-tech and low cost - it costs nothing beyond the practitioner’s time, and requires no technology or other salable “props.”  Hence, if Spiritual Healing became widely accepted and gained traction, it would dismantle parts of the medical-industrial complex, which relies on people being ill, and the enormous reoccurring revenues from doctor’s visits, procedures, and pharmaceuticals that come with it.  Our culture is more profit than wellness driven, and there is enormous resistance to this shift from a financial perspective. 

Second, Spiritual Healing operates within the unseen aspect of our earthly existence, that of consciousness, and consciousness has thus far been science's, and our general cultural underpinning’s, "elephant in the room.”  Science, and the medical establishment in particular, has as yet not been willing to openly investigate the connection between consciousness and illness, and how the mind influences the body’s well or ill being.  Consciousness is the elephant in the room that scientists don't dare to mention for fear of being discredited.  

When we turn this tide, when the scientific and medical establishments openly acknowledge that consciousness influences matter, and not the other way around, that healing and ill being happen on the mental plane, it will be a momentous paradigm shift in human consciousness evolution so big we can't even predict all the implications to our way of life.

Here a related earlier post on healing eras and energy medicine.

as above, so below

The other day I was newly setting up my calendar on my cellphone, having previously only managed appointments and events on an agenda book that's sitting in the middle of the house where I walk by many a times a day and peek into it.  What struck me as I was setting up the virtual calendar was that it automatically pulled up event locations as I typed them in, which then automatically would enable me to obtain directions, call the place up, email it, or look at their website for more information.  Many of you are already operating like this, but I was struck and realized something else. 

We may not all fully accept a collective subconscious or the interconnectedness of all beings on the non-physical plane yet, although scientists are coming around to that - see Robin Wall Kimmerer's book Braiding Sweetgrass and similar botanical research I covered in another post. This complete interconnectedness with via the cloud or the interweb is intertwining us via technology and informs how we interact and organize in our physical environment.  

From there it is just one step to fully realize, "As above, so below." "As above, so below" is a spiritual tenet that originates in the hermetic tradition and says that what's happening on a micro level is also happening on a macro level. The technological interconnectedness seems to me like a mirror reflection of this other interconnectedness, the one Larry Dossey, internationally known physician, author and speaker, refers to in his latest book One Mind, the universal consciousness that ancient and newly revived or developed healing modalities also tap into.

The complete interconnectedness of almost the entire human population now through cloud computing and the internet/interweb physically mirrors the complete interconnectedness we have with all of life on a consciousness level.  As above, so below.

             

new right-brain culture

I so love the new values.  I can feel it in my bones that a more meaningful culture is lurking underneath all this mess and morass.  Already in 2005 Daniel Pink wrote in his insightful and very readable A Whole New Mind:  Why Right Brainers Will Rule The Future,  "We've moved from an economy built on people's backs to an economy built on people's left brains to what is emerging today: an economy and society built more and more on people's right brains."

The Age of Creativity!  You probably remember, at least by title, the book Drawing On The Right Side Of The Brain, that taught drawing intuitively rather than intellectually.  The right side of the brain governs our creative-emotional aspect, the left our rational-analytical.  Neither can function without the other, or rather both sides inform each other to make us human, although we're not necessarily perfectly balanced. In general terms many really creative people lack a bit of rational-analytical, and many sciency, techy or businessy people lack some creative-emotional.  Others seem perfectly balanced (my daughter can navigate both complicated scientific details and concepts, and she is very creative at the same time).  In addition, more women are slightly right brain heavy, while more guys are a bit left brain heavy (that's what that other fun book, Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus was all about).  Here a link to a good article that compares the two sides of the brain.

Pink is saying that we're moving towards a more creative, empathic cultural and economic model.  That is also the reason why the humanities are on the rise again. Corporations are finally understanding that people who have learned to think, to look at broad cultural patterns and ideas, and who are creative, will do well in many different business environments because they think laterally and out-of-the box, instead of linearly within their field.  Right-brainers can make connections between seemingly unrelated fields. Waldorf Education has always taught to make such lateral connections, and speaks to this cultural shift (Rudolf Steiner, its founder and a brilliant visionary, was way ahead of his times.  We're only now catching up to his many ideas.).  

So, are you well balanced between both sides of the brain?  More left brain?  Or more right brain?

 

value or not?

Yuval Noah Harari writes in Sapiens"For decades, aluminum was much more expensive than gold.  In the 1860s, Emperor Napoleon III of France commissioned aluminum cutlery to be laid out for his most distinguished guests. Less important visitors had to make do with the gold knives and forks."

Value is not intrinsic to an item or a service. It's made up based on cultural beliefs we buy into together.  Think Netherlands tulip craze that imploded, think sugar price drop from the Middle Ages to now. In our culture we believe that time is precious, so precious that American employers give very little of it away for vacation and personal time off, while indigenous people, even though their lives are often shorter than ours, seem to have lots of it to sit around a campfire telling stories or making music together, and Europeans get six weeks vacation on top of all of their religious holidays.  We also believe that money is scarce since we love a good bargain and  try to pay as little as possible for our acquisitions.  

Now we laugh at Napoleon III's "precious" aluminum cutlery, but it goes to show how values come and go, and are based on scarcity, perceived or actual.  Value is really a made-up story.  Your values may be slightly different from mine, so that I might spend more money on things that you might not value the same way I do, and vice versa.  I think some luxury cars are cool looking, but would not spend the money on one.  I'm totally fine with a utilitarian car in which I can transport all of my recycling items to the various drop-off points, and my (sometimes) mud caked organic produce fresh from the farm to home, without fear of messing up my car.  I value my health first and foremost since my life depends on it, hence I value highest the best food and the best healing services I can pay for.

What do you spend your money on?  What do you value?  What do you not value?  What do you not spend your money on?