the case for perfection

Why do we so relentlessly question nature’s perfection?  In general, we seem to want to improve nature because we don’t think it’s perfect.  We see the bugs on the lettuce as a pest to be eradicated rather than asking why.  When the climate goes haywire or a virus affects the entire planet many see it as an aberration of nature instead of asking how it happened. Who is the culprit, we ask.

Nature is perfect - resilient, beautiful, abundant, grand, powerful, adaptable, magical, and a mirror of our beliefs and actions. When we can’t see that because we’re disconnected from it and interfere with it in order to bend it to our own distorted interpretation of what should be, that’s when the trouble starts. The trouble can manifest as climate change, Covid-19, Japanese beetle infestation, bee colony collapse syndrome, drought, and so many other environmental issues.  It also manifests in ourselves as disease or psychological issues.  As a species, we live in a permanent state of discontent and want to improve everything around us, yet have lost the key to seeing where to start.  

When we reconnect with the spiritual nature of nature, and that of our own imbeddedness in it, when we begin to search for that potentially bigger picture we just can’t see as yet, when we learn to trust that there’s rhyme and reason behind life instead of uncontrollable randomness, it all becomes more reassuring.  The key is actually inside each one of us, not out there.  This is an invitation to go inward and reconnect with ourselves and the bigger picture, that we are one with nature, not apart from it, and that when we’re out of balance, nature as a consequence suffers that imbalance and shows it to us like a mirror.  

Each one of us, hence, has the tremendous and awesome task to reconnect,  inward and outward, with our own true nature from which everything springs.  When you shift, it shifts.  When I shift, it shifts.  

wow!

When was the last time a bully motivated you to shift your attitude or behavior through threats or other aggressive measures?  I didn’t think so.

Dismantling the Minneapolis police department,  as their City Counsel vowed to do a few days ago?   I thought I didn’t hear right.  Even reducing police department funding, as many other large US cities are all of a sudden discussing, seems radical for here.  I would have said “interesting,” if I had heard something like that about Norway, which has, proportionately, one of the lowest prison populations in the world, because their approach to criminal justice is reformative, not punitive.  But here!  That is an amazing shift towards constructive social change.  

With one of the worst racial inequalities in the country, the idea to reform Minneapolis’s social fabric by shifting funding from police to community development is nothing short of radical, a nonviolent approach in nonviolent communication speak.  Granted, it’ll take time to develop the logistics (here an outline of what alternate policing might look like), and this idea will not sit well with many conservatives.

But the increasingly aggressive, authoritarian and weaponized approach to policing in this country has not made things better.  Authoritarian behavior results in anger, distrust, defiance, and ultimately resignation, a result of a punitive criminal justice system with its disproportionately large prison population compared to other Western countries.  “An eye for an eye” does not work, only a compassionate approach ultimately does because it builds people up instead of taking them down (see an earlier post, “drop the hammer,” on this).  It’s the difference between a glass half full or a glass half empty, or seeing the best in people instead of the worst.  

We are witnessing something big.  When the time is ripe things can get unstuck, and stuff beyond our wildest dreams is possible.  

from I to we - silver lining #13

You would like to go back to work and earn a living again.  You have elder relatives who may be at risk.  Perhaps your business must open again so you can make money and put food on your table.  You’d like to go back to normal.  You’d love to see your parents again, and your parents would love to see their grandchildren again.  You’d like to go on vacation.  You’d like to send your kids to camp over the summert. You’d like to feel secure out there again.  Or perhaps you’re on the frontlines and don’t feel that your work conditions are safe.  

We all want this virus gone, we all need to put food on our tables, we all want to see our friends in person and send our kids back to school and college.  Yet, our concerns express themselves in polarizing ways because we see different ways to get there.  Some are ok with social distancing, lockdowns, and mouthguards in public in order to help flatten the curve.  Others are urgently concerned about their financial situation and the curtailing of their freedom.  They are two sides of the same coin.  

What’s striking about this virus is that each one of us could unknowingly carry the virus for two weeks, or carry it without ever developing symptoms, and unintentionally infect dozens and even hundreds of others during that time.  That makes each one of us a crucial link in the effort to break the spread of the virus.  Each one of us on a worldwide basis is all of a sudden important in helping to prevent others from getting sick, to prevent the overwhelming of the healthcare system, the food system, the distribution networks.  We have already realized how dependent on foreign supply chains the world is - when too many people in China get sick, economies in many countries slow down.  When too many US meat plant workers get sick, Wendy’s runs out of hamburgers and the supermarkets have to ration meat purchases.  When the neighbor down the road parties, or heads to a crowded beach, her friends, her parents, the meat plant worker, or the supermarket cashier could get sick.

This pandemic is showing us the way from I to We.  No matter how you slice it or dice it, we’re in this together.